Market comparison · 2026-10-02

What operating models can accounting firms choose from?

Modernisation is not only a software decision. It can also be a structural decision. This page compares UK and international group, service and platform models factually, without winner scores.

Five common modernisation paths

Five common modernisation paths

Where a primary source does not clearly describe a dimension, the table does not fill the gap with assumptions.

01

Independent + point tools

Select, integrate and operate the technology yourself.

02

Group / network model

Share wider structures, services or brand depending on the provider.

03

Online accounting firm

Accounting/advisory service combined with a proprietary digital platform.

04

Practice / workflow platform

Software used by independent firms and their clients.

05

Technology partnership

Remain independent while using shared infrastructure such as Dynafis.

Comparison matrix

Differences supported by public sources

Where a primary source does not clearly describe a dimension, the table does not fill the gap with assumptions.

Model categoryDynafisTechnology platformGravitaAccounting groupXeinadinAccounting groupDextPractice/workflow platformKarbonPractice/workflow platform
Core modelTechnology and infrastructure partnership for independent accounting firms.Tech-enabled UK accountancy and advisory group built through a growing full-service practice.UK and Ireland accountancy/advisory group combining local relationships with a wider network and digital platform.Bookkeeping automation platform for accountants, bookkeepers and businesses.International accounting practice-management platform.
Business independenceThe firm remains organisationally independent; using the platform does not require selling the firm.Public positioning focuses on one tech-enabled accounting partner rather than a software-only network for independent firms.Client proposition is delivered through the group and local offices; this is not a software-only independence model.Accounting practices remain their own businesses and use Dext as software.Firms remain independent and use Karbon as operational software.
Ownership / equityNo acquisition or equity model is required by the accounting-firm partnership offer.Legal entities are publicly listed; acquisition/combination mechanics vary and are not generalised here.Publicly not reduced here to one standard structure across all offices.No accounting-firm acquisition is required to use the platform.No firm acquisition model is required to use the software.
Central servicesE-invoicing, client workflows, automation and finance infrastructure; Dynafis is not an accounting practice.Accountancy, audit, tax, outsourcing and advisory services delivered by the group.Accountancy and business advisory with nationwide/international network resources.Document collection, data extraction/categorisation and publishing into accounting software.Practice workflow, client engagements, email/work management, billing/payments and related operational modules.
Technology platformOne platform for e-invoicing, workflows, client collaboration, automation and traceable finance processes.Gravita describes a modern accounting approach underpinned by technology and digital solutions.Xeinadin states that its secure digital platform supports efficient online service and real-time data-driven advice.Cloud bookkeeping automation with practice/client workflows.Practice management platform designed around work, clients and revenue.
Local compliance / e-invoicingEuropean e-invoicing orientation with country-specific workflows where supported.UK accounting, tax and audit services.UK and Ireland accounting/advisory services.International platform; country-specific accounting/compliance remains with connected systems and practices.International workflow platform rather than a jurisdiction-specific tax/e-invoicing provider.
AI / automationControlled workflow and automation capabilities within production Dynafis modules.Technology-enabled delivery is explicit; specific AI workflow scope is not uniformly described on the cited pages.Digital enablement is explicit; detailed AI workflow claims are not generalised here.Automated financial-data extraction and bookkeeping workflows.AI and workflow automation are part of the product proposition; exact capabilities depend on plan/module.
Data / tenant separationWorkspace/client separation and explicit permissions; partner status alone never grants client access.Publicly not described as a tenant-isolation product model.Publicly not described as a tenant-isolation software proposition.Practice accounts manage teams and clients; detailed tenant architecture is not inferred beyond public product behaviour.Public product is multi-practice SaaS; detailed tenancy controls are not inferred here.
Target usersIndependent firms that want to modernise technology and operations without joining an accounting group.Businesses seeking an integrated, tech-enabled accounting and advisory provider.Businesses wanting accounting/advisory services from a larger digitally enabled group.Accounting and bookkeeping firms seeking document/data automation.Accounting firms seeking practice management and operational workflow software.

View detailed comparison

Dynafis and Gravita, side by side

The detailed view separates organisational model, technology platform and responsibility boundaries, with links to current primary sources.

View detailed comparison

Primary sources

Sources and review date

Competitor information is based on linked public first-party material. Volatile figures are not treated as permanent product claims.

Modernise your firm without selling it.

If technology and process modernisation are your priority, you can explore Dynafis in a self-guided flow.